|
|
Post by Mindy on Aug 29, 2004 22:30:02 GMT -5
I can't agree on Paul with that. I mean what difference does it make anyway? I still think Paul deserves the rights a tad more then Yoko, and definitely a LOT more then Jacko. I have nothing against Yoko, it's just that, he wrote them. He should have his music, and Yoko could have John's. But, hm, what do I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cranberry Sauce on Aug 30, 2004 2:21:08 GMT -5
Yeah, I've always thought it was a bit petty. I mean, the people who are non-fans to sort of fans probably assume that "Lennon/McCartney" means equal contribution. I know that's what I thought before I became a bigger fan. "McCartney/Lennon" implies the same thing... equal contribution to the song. And anyone who's a bigger fan knows that Paul did "Yesterday" all on his own even though the credit reads "Lennon/McCartney." So there doesn't seem to much of a point to me....
Besides, "Lennon/McCartney" is alphabetical order... isn't that how song credits usually go?
|
|
|
|
Post by CrowDish on Aug 30, 2004 10:19:06 GMT -5
Yeah - no real difference, really. If it's going to be Lennon/McCartney, it's going to be Lennon/McCartney, you know? People recognize that, it's too well known to change
|
|
|
|
Post by Mindy on Aug 30, 2004 11:42:43 GMT -5
Yeah it is really doesn't matter. I love the songs no matter if its Lennon/McCartney or McCartney/Lennon. But Lennon/McCartney just sounds right, I guess I'm just used to it by now. But yeah, he definitely deserves the rights to 'Yesterday' mhmm. It was his song. Wow from reading some of my posts, I say 'just' and 'y'know' a lot.  sorry if it gets annoying. |
|
|
|
Post by Zap on Aug 30, 2004 12:17:49 GMT -5
Actually, I've heard that Paul only wants the lennon/mccartney changed for Yesterday, because for a while Yoko was getting more royalties from it then Paul was. I totally agree with him, it is afterall HIS baby and John didn't help at all. I think John would want it changed, because he knew it was all Paul's.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mindy on Aug 30, 2004 21:58:42 GMT -5
Well than, I think it should be. If it's just that one song, then what the hell?
|
|
|
|
Post by CrowDish on Aug 30, 2004 22:04:10 GMT -5
As long as he's doing that, there's no point in just switching the names. John didn't bloody do anything, change it to bloody 'McCartney' if that's what you bloody want. All or nothing. I'm frustrated with this wishy washy 'oh, paul wrote it so his name should be first'. If Paul wrote it, it should be Paul's name.
|
|
Belinda
Nowhere Man
Little Linda Luv Paul
Posts: 34
|
Post by Belinda on Aug 31, 2004 1:15:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by CrowDish on Aug 31, 2004 8:40:52 GMT -5
No WONDER that stupid Culkin kid was so frightened!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mindy on Aug 31, 2004 10:19:47 GMT -5
lol!! Oh Belinda that was great!  |
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Aug 31, 2004 18:35:17 GMT -5
I would have just fallen over dead if I saw that in my window!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mindy on Aug 31, 2004 18:47:32 GMT -5
haha! I think anyone would. ;D
|
|
Belinda
Nowhere Man
Little Linda Luv Paul
Posts: 34
|
Post by Belinda on Sept 1, 2004 2:21:40 GMT -5
Thought you would like it ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Mindy on Sept 19, 2004 21:36:59 GMT -5
Did anyone see this new Buick commercial?! Aghhh.
I want Jacko to go to prison already!!
Paperback Writer on a bloody car commercial!!!! What is that?!!?!?!?
|
|
|
|
Post by Icee on Sept 19, 2004 21:40:27 GMT -5
I don't get it. They could of atleast have used Baby You Can Drive My Car  I don't know what to say about Micheal Jackson, I don't know about him you know. All I really wanna say is I love the video clip for Say Say Say |
|
sorry if it gets annoying. 
